|
Home Up
Back to Top
Back to Top
Back to Top
Back to Top
Back to Top
Back to Top
Back to Top
Back to Top
Back to Top
Back to Top
Back to Top
Back to Top
Back to Top
| |
Miscellaneous Article page:
DOH Nassau County Health
Department
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
CONTACT: Wade Sparkman
September 26, 2007
(904-548-1830)
Red Tide Health Advisory
Amelia Island – Due to
recent citizen reports of respiratory distress – such as persistent cough and
watery eyes – while at area beaches, the Nassau County Health Department is
issuing a health advisory for Florida red tide.
The Health Department will continue to conduct area beach monitoring and will
issue additional health advisories as needed. Water samples collected on
9/25/207 confirmed the presence of the red organism off the coast of Amelia
Island.
A red-tide event may
result in mild respiratory symptoms such as eye, nose, and throat irritation
similar to cold or allergy symptoms. This may persist while on or near the
shore. Health officials recommend that people experiencing these symptoms stay
away from beach areas -- once a person leaves the red tide area, the symptoms
usually go away. People with severe or chronic respiratory conditions such as
asthma or chronic lung disease are cautioned to avoid visiting the beach.
Precautions should be
taken when preparing and cooking fish caught in local waters. Individuals should
not eat locally-harvested molluscan shellfish such as oysters, clams, and
coquinas when red tide may be present. Red tide may also cause fish kills.
Residents living in beach
areas are advised to close windows and run the air conditioner (making sure that
the A/C filter is maintained according to manufacturer's specifications). If
outdoors, residents may choose to wear paper filter masks, especially if onshore
winds are blowing. For people with long-term exposure, such as beach workers or
fishermen, a more properly fitted mask is recommended.
Red tide can affect
humans if they consume contaminated molluscan shellfish or come into contact
with the organism through the water or the beach air. During a red tide, bivalve
shellfish, including clams and oysters, can concentrate the toxin and cause
neurotoxic shellfish poisoning (NSP) in humans if eaten. Both mild
gastrointestinal and neurological symptoms occur in NSP, which can include
tingling and numbness of lips, tongue, and throat, muscular aches, dizziness,
reversal of the sensations of hot and cold, diarrhea, and vomiting. Onset of
this illness occurs within a few minutes to a few hours; duration is fairly
short, from a few hours to several days. Recovery is complete with few after
effects; no fatalities have been reported.
Cooking does not
eliminate the toxin. Only clams and oysters collected in shellfish harvesting
areas monitored and open for harvesting, as determined by the Florida Department
of Agriculture and Consumer Services (DACS), should be eaten. Scallops may be
consumed as long as only the muscle is eaten. Any healthy finfish harvested from
red tide affected waters should be carefully filleted and cooked fresh, avoiding
consumption of roe and internal organs. The meat of fresh, healthy fish is safe
to eat.
Other effects of red tide
are temporary, with no long-term health effects. Individuals with severe chronic
respiratory conditions such as emphysema or asthma should avoid beach areas and
contact with water spray during red tide conditions. Susceptible people may
experience varying degrees of eye, nose, and throat irritation similar to cold
symptoms when coming into contact with salt water spray (such as from water
skiing, prop turbulence, windsurfing). A rash may occur after contact with
affected water, and usually goes away within 24 hours. After swimming in an
affected area, it is a good idea to rinse off with clean fresh water. Swallowed
water is unlikely to cause health effects.
Many questions are asked
about what to do with the fish that have died during red tide conditions.
Contact with fish killed during a red tide does not produce any red tide
associated symptoms. However, these fish can present a nuisance, in that they
have an unpleasant odor, and attract flies and vermin. These fish may be
disposed of according to local solid waste practices. It is recommended that
gloves or tools be used to collect any fish and to use double-lined plastic bags
for disposal.
Attached is a summary of
common questions and answers about red tide. The public may obtain more
information on ongoing red tide events from the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Research Institute. The Institutes' website is
http://research.myfwc.com and the Florida Department of Health website is
http:/www.myfloridaEH.com under Aquatic Toxins.
The Florida Poison
Control Information Center in Miami has a toll-free 24/7 Aquatic Toxins Hotline
for reporting of illnesses from exposure to red tide, or for more information on
red tide and associated health effects, at 1-888-232-8635.
____________**_____________
|
WEST
PALM
BEACH:
Plan in
Works
for
Tallest
Building
in U.S.
[Palm
Beach
Post]
A
proposal
for one
of the
most
prominent
pieces
of
undeveloped
land
downtown
is a
1,500-foot
tower
with an
observation
deck -
unmistakably
resembling
Seattle's
Space
Needle -
that
would be
the
second-highest
building
in the
world
and the
tallest
in the
United
States.
But it's
too
early to
tell
what
will be
actually
built on
the
land.
|
|
|
|
|
|

Dear Richard,
The GRN has been working for the
rebuilding of red snapper populations in the Gulf for many years, and a light
has finally appeared at the end of the tunnel! In March of this year, a federal
court ruled in our favor that fisheries managers must take steps to end the
overexploitation of red snapper by commercial and recreational fishermen and to
rebuild the population.
With the red snapper stock known to be
depleted and overexploited since 1988, this victory is a long-time coming. Fun
to fish for and a favorite at restaurants across the country, young red snapper
are also caught as bycatch in shrimp nets, subjecting the fishery to three
significant pressures: recreational fishing, directed commercial fishing, and
commercial shrimp fishing.
The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council (Gulf Council) is now putting together a plan to follow the court
decision and rebuild red snapper populations.
Please take a moment to support the track
the Gulf Council is on, and remind them that a rebuilt red snapper population is
worth three times as much to the economy of our region! Visit this website to
learn more and send your message:
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizationsORG/GRN/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=11397
The public comment period closes as
the end of the month, so please click to comment now.
For our fish and our future,
Aaron Viles
Campaign Director
The Gulf Restoration Network (GRN)
is a diverse network of local, regional and national groups dedicated to
protecting and restoring the valuable resources of the Gulf of Mexico. The GRN
has members in the five Gulf states of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama
and Florida.
If you do not want to receive
further emails from the GRN, please
click here to change your mailing preferences on the web.

Seeping seawater threatens Florida's drinking supply
With salt intrusion threatening well fields, water
managers called for shutting down four cities' pumps and
cutting Broward and Palm Beach to one day of irrigation
a week.
With the drought elevating a perpetual problem into a
critical concern, state water managers are poised today
to impose severe new restrictions to combat a seeping
front of sea water that threatens the water supply for
hundreds of thousands of coastal residents.
All residents in Broward and Palm Beach counties
would be ordered to slash lawn watering to once a week.
Utilities in Hallandale Beach, Dania Beach, Lantana and
Lake Worth could face shutting down wells where chloride
readings, a red flag for salt water intrusion, have been
rising for weeks.
Water managers defend such unprecedented steps as
necessary to avert more disruptive and expensive damage
-- salt contamination of coastal well fields that could
force some cities to abandon primary drinking wells or
install new treatment systems. At least eight more well
fields, from South Miami-Dade to Palm Beach, also are
considered ''at risk'' if groundwater levels fall low
enough to allow an underground wedge of sea water to
push deeper inland.
`A HUGE CONCERN'
''The threat of salt water intrusion is a huge
concern,'' said Jesus Rodriguez, spokesman for the South
Florida Water Management District, which oversees the
water supply for 16 counties.
The district's governing board will meet today in
West Palm Beach to consider staff recommendations that
would tighten what already rank as the toughest
water-use restrictions in South Florida history.
While wildfires and wilted lawns, marshes and crops
are the most visible effects of the 17-month long
drought, salt intrusion looms as a major threat to the
regional water supply -- already so low that drought
effects could linger for years, even with a good rainy
season.
If wells get too salty to supply water that meets
state health standards, it could force cities to look
for others sources and further strain a scare resource.
''Once that [salt] creeps in there, it could be years
for the wells to be brought back on line,'' Rodriguez
said. ``The scenario is a grim one. We could be talking
about bottled water for the municipalities for a long
time.''
The latest proposed cutbacks could prove costly for
Broward and Palm Beach residents, particularly in four
cities ordered to shut down major water supply wells.
In Dania Beach, public services director Dominic
Orlando said the city still will be able to supply some
12,000 residents with water despite shutting down its
two main wells just west of Ravenswood Road. But buying,
blending and chemically treating water from Broward
County and Hollywood will cost the city $100,000 more a
month, an expense residents will see reflected in water
bills.
''If we turn off our wells, just to break even we
have to implement a surcharge of 60-plus percent,'' said
Orlando. He argued that daily monitoring and a gradual
decrease in pumping could protect the city's wells
without punishing residents' pocketbooks.
''Just to tell us to shut down your system, geez,
that's absurd,'' he said.
MORE RESTRICTIONS
Under the proposal, Miami-Dade would remain on
twice-weekly watering restrictions -- for now. Above
average rainfall in the county has buoyed levels in the
southern portions of the Biscayne Aquifer, South
Florida's primary source of drinking water.
Still, the district considers a string of wells in
South Miami-Dade, including ones that serve Florida
City, the Florida Keys, Homestead and parts of the
county, at potential risk because they're close to the
salt water intrusion line. ''Right now, we're sort of on
alert and certainly needing to conserve as a hedge
against what may or may not happen over the next couple
of months,'' said Doug Yoder, assistant director of
Miami-Dade's Water and Sewer Department.
WAITING FOR RAIN
Though Broward and eastern Palm Beach also tap the
Biscayne Aquifer, conditions are much drier there,
Rodriguez said. Rainfall, despite a promising start in
May, has remained well below average for a year and a
half and groundwater levels continue to drop -- with no
help of replenishment until the rainy season kicks in.
Lake Okeechobee serves as the region's storage
reservoir, but at 9.42 feet above sea level Wednesday,
it is too low to help. Last month, the district also
capped withdrawals from the Everglades water
conservation areas west of the suburbs, though water
managers have asked federal permission to override
environmental regulations to do emergency recharges of
well fields.
The problem is that plunging groundwater levels along
the coast could weaken what hydrologists call the
''head'' that holds back, or more accurately, slows
ocean waters that have been creeping underground for
decades.
The heavier salt water tends to wedge under the fresh
water, forcing it inland and shrinking the aquifer's
coastal boundary.
So far, salt concentrations, measured in chloride
readings, remain below state health standards at the
at-risk wells. But water managers say cutting local
demand is a key to keeping things that way. That's why
they're ordering the four most vulnerable cities to shut
down pumping, Rodriquez said. A well pulling millions of
gallons of water out of the ground can create a
so-called cone of influence that helps pull salt water
inland.
''We don't want to find ourselves in a scenario in a
few weeks down the road where we're having to face a
much more critical situation,'' Rodriguez said.
Intrusion is not a new concern. Utilities have been
battling it since the 1930s, when new drainage canals
and well fields pulled salt water deep into the Miami
River.
In 1946, salinity-control gates were installed and
the salt water pushed back. But a ''blob'' still remains
trapped underground near Miami Springs, said Scott
Prinos, a supervisory hydrologist for the U.S.
Geological Survey.
Over the years, engineers have learned to control the
intrusion, but not stop it completely. The line has
shifted in and out after droughts or heavy rains, but
enough salt water has crept inland deep enough to turn a
number of private and public wells brackish or too salty
to use for drinking water.
MAN-MADE CANALS
The current intrusion line snakes six miles into deep
Southeastern Miami-Dade, the result largely of drainage
canals altering the flow of freshwater marshes. Though
the line is thinner in Broward, a few miles at its
widest, the risk is greater because more coastal wells
were sunk near beachside cities.
Dania Beach, said Orlando, was already scouting
locations for new wells farther inland. Drought concerns
have expedited the search and upped investments in the
water system. A contractor started drilling test wells
Monday. The city also is constructing a huge new storage
tank and a treatment plant that can handle more water
from Broward.
He doesn't think there is any threat taps will run
dry.
''The issue, I think, is that provided water is going
to be a lot more expensive,'' said Orlando.
CURTIS MORGAN,
Maimi Herald
Miami Herald staff writer Jennifer Mooney
Piedra contributed to this story.
_________**__________
- 24 Feb 06
U.S. scores a D+ on ocean policy.
Hi Richard,
|
U.S. scores a
D+ on ocean policy.

Unsustainable fishing practices are wreaking
havoc on the red snapper and Gulf fisheries.
|
|
|
The United States has just been graded on the quality and
effectiveness of its ocean policy, and guess what? - we got a
D+. And nowhere is the failure to
protect our marine ecosystems more apparent than off of Florida's coast
in the Gulf of Mexico.
Take
Action!
Economically, red snapper has been a staple of the fishing economy in
Florida and the entire Gulf region for over 125 years, supporting
important commercial and recreational fisheries. But thanks to poor,
irresponsible management, over-fishing has drastically reduced the
number of red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico to 3% of their natural
levels! Take Action!
Throughout most of the 1960s, Gulf fishermen brought in record catches
of red snapper. But in 1967, catches started declining and fish sizes
got smaller. Even as fishermen worked harder, their incomes fell.
Competition grew for shrinking numbers of fish, so fishermen invested in
bigger boats and high-tech fishing gear. This depleted fish stocks
further and damaged habitat. Today, the red snapper fisheries are in
crisis..
It’s not too late. As fisheries regulators currently debate, we have the
opportunity to rebuild the red snapper population, which will benefit
the marine ecosystem and future generations of fishing communities that
depend on it.
In the past, the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council and the
National Marine Fisheries Service have been unable to make the tough
decisions necessary to end over fishing of red snapper. That is why we
need you to speak up!
Tell decision-makers you care about the future of Gulf fishing and don’t
want to see it harmed by irresponsible management.
Thank you for making a difference today,
Agata Gussmann
Care2 and ThePetitionSite Team
P.S. How did the U.S. score a D+ for our ocean policy reform? The
bipartisan Joint Ocean Commission Initiative just released its report
card showing little progress has been made over the past year, and
"our nation’s oceans, coasts, and Great Lakes are in serious trouble."
(Admiral James D. Watkins, co-chair of the Joint Ocean Commission
Initiative) We can start
reversing this crisis by protecting the ocean closest to our homes.
|
_________**____________
- 25 Jan 05 Whale
Watchers........
Hi Interested whale observers!
I want to let you know that I will be giving a free talk about dolphins and
whales at noon on Friday, February 24 at Sandy Bottoms, by Main
Beach. My stories, illustrated with my own slides on the big screen t.v.
will include some surprising true anecdotes from my many years as education
director of Marine World in California. If you attend, expect to hear some
interesting true animal stories, and learn more about their intelligence and
individual personalities when they relate to humans. I will also give more
information about the whales and dolphins along our coast, and
their behavior and interactions with humans and each other.
It should be a lot of fun--I hope you and your friends can come. If you do
plan on coming, I'd love to know in advance so I can alert Sandy Bottoms
about how many to expect. We're in uncharted territory here and don't know
what to expect. The Sandy Bottoms announcement is attached below. The talk
will be at lunchtime and if you plan on eating then, that would be good to
know in advance too so they can plan for a group. If you just want to come
for the talk, that's ok, too. One way or the other, come on over and feel
free to forward this to others that you know might be interested too.
Regards,
Pat Foster-Turley, Ph.D.
DOLPHINS, WHALES and PEOPLE, OH MY!
News-Leader columnist Pat Foster-Turley will share stories of her encounters
with some of the world's biggest and smartest mammals. How smart are
dolphins, anyway? What lurks behind that beguiling smile? Was there really a
Flipper? And, how about those large right whales that migrate off our coast?
Join us at noon on Friday, Feb. 24 in our main dining room. Foster-Turley
will show slides, share stories and answer your questions about the
creatures that live off our coast. Admission is free and the talk will last
about an hour
- 20 Nov 05 Whales vs US
Navy Sonar
By Christopher
Munsey - Gannett News Service
{Take a look at this site
also:
Report: Ocean noise threatens dolphins,
whales - Science - MSNBC.com }
A site off the coast of Wallops Island is
one of three possible locations proposed by
the Navy to install an undersea warfare
training range for the practice of active
sonar skills.
A senior Navy official familiar with
anti-submarine warfare at the Pentagon said
at a recent news briefing that Atlantic
Fleet Navy units need a place to practice
ASW (anti-submarine warfare) before
deploying. That's because of the threat
posed by increasingly quiet diesel-electric
submarines, often operating in shallow and
noisy coastal waters, the official said.
Better technology means that the submarines
are now so quiet that passive sonar --
listening for the noise created by the boats
-- won't detect their presence until such a
submarine is close enough to fire a torpedo,
he said.
"You want to take them out before they get
that close," he said.
The only sure way to find a quiet submarine
lurking beneath the surface is active sonar,
which sends a burst of sound, producing an
echo when it bounces off an underwater
target. The echo is then used to locate the
quarry.
No matter how quiet, a submarine can't
escape detection from a pulse of sound
bouncing off its hull, the official said.
"As submarines get quieter, passive means
are less effective. But submarine quieting
has no effect on active means," he said.
Called the Undersea Warfare Training Range,
the floor of a 500-square-mile section of
ocean will be wired with a network of
hydrophones.
Using practice torpedoes, helicopters, ships
and submarines will use active sonar,
sonobuoys and other methods to practice ASW
against submarines posing as targets.
Navy officials developed three proposals for
the range, all located in larger offshore
coastal areas already used for Navy
training. The preferred site is about 50
miles offshore, southeast of Cherry Point,
N.C.
The area slopes down from more than 100 to
about 900 feet deep, giving operators a wide
range of depths to conduct ASW training, and
different water temperatures, depending on
whether training takes place in winter or
summer.
The second site proposed is about 45 miles
off the coast of Wallops Island, while the
third is just off the coast of Jacksonville,
Fla. "They are all equally compatible," said
Jim Brantley, spokesman for fleet forces
command in Norfolk, Va.
Brantley said the decision will not be made
until October 2006.
"It's going to be a long process," he said.
The Navy will hold open house information
sessions and public hearings in each of the
three proposed sites this November.
Officials and experts will hold a
public hearing at Chincoteague
Community Center on Community Drive
on Nov. 15 at 7 p.m. An open house
information session will be held
from 3:30 to 5:30 p.m.
The meeting will allow the public to
gather information on the Navy's
possible plans for Wallops Island,
including the onshore building that
will receive signals transmitted
from the sensors buried in the sand
off the coast. The building, he
said, will be constructed on federal
property.
To operate the range, the Navy is
seeking a letter of authorization
from the National Marine Fisheries
Service.
A second Navy official at the
briefing said that based on an
environmental review of marine
mammal species in the area, use of
the range will have a negligible
effect on sea life.
The officials spoke on background,
on the condition that their names
not be used.
Environmental concerns raised
The news briefing came a day after a
lawsuit filed by the Natural
Resources Defense Council on behalf
of a coalition of environmental
groups in federal court in
California.
The group's lawsuit charges that the
Navy's use of active sonar violates
federal environmental laws, seeks
restrictions on where and when Navy
units can use active sonar and asks
for more environmental studies from
the Navy about how active sonar
impacts marine mammals.
According to the lawsuit, active
sonar harms marine mammals, which
use their keen hearing to locate
prey, by interfering with their
movements and feeding. The loud
bursts of sound also cause physical
injury, and have been a cause of
marine mammals stranding themselves
on beaches and dying, the suit
alleges.
In its response to the lawsuit, the
Navy emphasized that training and
testing with active sonar is
critical to national defense.
To reduce the impact on marine
mammals, Navy watchstanders are
trained to spot and identify marine
mammals present in an area before a
sonar exercise takes place, said Lt.
William Marks, a Navy spokesman at
the Pentagon.
"Before we use sonar, we'll look for
any marine mammals in the area,"
Marks said.
If mammals are present, sonar
exercises will be curtailed or
halted, he said.
Staff Writer Kim Mitchell
contributed to this report.
Originally published November 8,
2005
|
Public
hearings
|
|
The Navy
will host three meetings during
the comment period so that
interested members of the public
can learn about the project and
the environmental impact
statement and offer their
comments. The format for these
meetings will be open house
information sessions in the
afternoon and early evening,
followed by a public hearing.
Meetings are
scheduled as follows:
November 21, 2005
Wilson Center for
the Arts
Florida Community
College,
Jacksonville South
Campus
11901 Beach
Boulevard
Jacksonville, FL
32246
904-646-2222
The
afternoon open house public
information session will be from
3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. and the
evening open house will start at
6:30 p.m. The public hearing
will be held from 7:00 p.m. to
9:30 p.m.
Comments should be submitted in
writing to:
Naval Facilities
Engineering Command Atlantic
Attn: Keith Jenkins
Code EV21 KJ
6506 Hampton Boulevard
Norfolk, VA 23508-1278
Fax: 757-322-4894
All comments must
be postmarked December 28, 2005,
to ensure that they become part
of the official record. All
comments on the draft OEIS/EIS
will be addressed in the final
environmental impact statement. |
----------------**-----------------
|
Administration Announces Weak New Mileage
Standards
Amidst rising oil and gas prices, the
Bush Administration yesterday announced its
new Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE)
standards for light trucks.
Environmentalists say the proposed rule
changes will do nothing to help American
motorists at the pump, nor will they reduce
America's dependence on imported oil.
The new standards appear to raise the
current light truck standard of 22.2 miles
per gallon (mpg) in model year 2007 to a
fleet-wide standard of 24 mpg by model year
2011.
However, the new standards actually
exempt vehicles weighing from 8,500 to
10,000 pounds-- such as the Hummer H2, Ford
Excursion, and some models of the Chevy
Suburban-- all vehicles that achieve very
poor mileage due to their size. [1]
Environmentalists argue that the Bush
Administration should make use of the latest
in automotive technology and establish a
more stringent fleet-wide average standard.
Ironically, General Motors is already
producing a vehicle in China that achieves
43 miles per gallon.
Instead of harnessing America's
technological know-how to require light
trucks and autos to meet a 40-mile per
gallon (mpg) average standard," said Anna
Aurilio, U.S. PIRG legislative director,
"the Administration has proposed a
pathetically weak increase in light truck
miles per gallon standards and has given
automakers an opportunity to game the system
by increasing the size of their SUVs and
other light trucks."
According to the Sierra Club, a 40-mpg
standard would save the average driver
$2,200 in fuel savings over the lifetime of
a vehicle. [2] The distribution of light
trucks into six size-based categories was
supported by the big three U.S. automakers,
General Motors, Ford Motor Co., and
DaimlerChrysler AG. [3]
Department of Transportation Secretary
Norman T. Mineta boasts that, "This is a
plan that will save gas and result in less
pain at the pump for motorists without
sacrificing safety." [4]
But Dan Becker, director of the Sierra
Club's Global Warming Program, says the new
standards will do nothing to help consumers
save money at the gas pump, reduce oil
dependence or curb global warming. "At a
time when Americans are paying record prices
for gas, the Bush administration has sided
with its cronies in the auto industry and
rejected real solutions," said Becker.
"Unfortunately, the proposed gains in
fuel economy are likely to be eliminated as
a result of the radical overhaul of the
current structure," the Sierra Club said in
a statement released yesterday. [5]
###
SOURCES:
[1]
"Bush Administration
Fuel Economy Fails to Address Rising Gas
Prices," Sierra Club, Aug. 23,
2005.
[2] Ibid.
[3] "Bush Admin Unveils New CAFE Standards
for Light Trucks," Greenwire, Aug. 23, 2005.
[4]
"Government Proposes
New Fuel Standards," Business
Week, Aug. 23, 2005.
[5] Sierra Club op. cit.
|
|
|
|
_________**________
|