Concerned Friends of Fernandina        

                    wpe3.jpg (29730 bytes)Copy of Downtown Streets.gif (83100 bytes)                  

                 Concerned Friends of Fernandina is a grassroots citizens group formed to inform and involve  residents wanting to

                 preserve the small town  identity of Fernandina Beach and its natural beauty.

Home Up

                     "With public sentiment, nothing can fail;  without it nothing can succeed." -- Abraham Lincoln

 

                 

   

      

 

 

       

 

 

 

Home
Up
                   

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Miscellaneous Article page:

 

 

 

 

  •  26 Sep 07

DOH Nassau County Health Department

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: Wade Sparkman

September 26, 2007 (904-548-1830)

 

Red Tide Health Advisory

 

Amelia Island – Due to recent citizen reports of respiratory distress – such as persistent cough and watery eyes – while at area beaches, the Nassau County Health Department is issuing a health advisory for Florida red tide. The Health Department will continue to conduct area beach monitoring and will issue additional health advisories as needed. Water samples collected on 9/25/207 confirmed the presence of the red organism off the coast of Amelia Island.

 A red-tide event may result in mild respiratory symptoms such as eye, nose, and throat irritation similar to cold or allergy symptoms. This may persist while on or near the shore. Health officials recommend that people experiencing these symptoms stay away from beach areas -- once a person leaves the red tide area, the symptoms usually go away. People with severe or chronic respiratory conditions such as asthma or chronic lung disease are cautioned to avoid visiting the beach.

 Precautions should be taken when preparing and cooking fish caught in local waters. Individuals should not eat locally-harvested molluscan shellfish such as oysters, clams, and coquinas when red tide may be present. Red tide may also cause fish kills.

 Residents living in beach areas are advised to close windows and run the air conditioner (making sure that the A/C filter is maintained according to manufacturer's specifications). If outdoors, residents may choose to wear paper filter masks, especially if onshore winds are blowing. For people with long-term exposure, such as beach workers or fishermen, a more properly fitted mask is recommended.

 Red tide can affect humans if they consume contaminated molluscan shellfish or come into contact with the organism through the water or the beach air. During a red tide, bivalve shellfish, including clams and oysters, can concentrate the toxin and cause neurotoxic shellfish poisoning (NSP) in humans if eaten. Both mild gastrointestinal and neurological symptoms occur in NSP, which can include tingling and numbness of lips, tongue, and throat, muscular aches, dizziness, reversal of the sensations of hot and cold, diarrhea, and vomiting. Onset of this illness occurs within a few minutes to a few hours; duration is fairly short, from a few hours to several days. Recovery is complete with few after effects; no fatalities have been reported.

 Cooking does not eliminate the toxin. Only clams and oysters collected in shellfish harvesting areas monitored and open for harvesting, as determined by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (DACS), should be eaten. Scallops may be consumed as long as only the muscle is eaten. Any healthy finfish harvested from red tide affected waters should be carefully filleted and cooked fresh, avoiding consumption of roe and internal organs. The meat of fresh, healthy fish is safe to eat.

 Other effects of red tide are temporary, with no long-term health effects. Individuals with severe chronic respiratory conditions such as emphysema or asthma should avoid beach areas and contact with water spray during red tide conditions. Susceptible people may experience varying degrees of eye, nose, and throat irritation similar to cold symptoms when coming into contact with salt water spray (such as from water skiing, prop turbulence, windsurfing). A rash may occur after contact with affected water, and usually goes away within 24 hours. After swimming in an affected area, it is a good idea to rinse off with clean fresh water. Swallowed water is unlikely to cause health effects.

 Many questions are asked about what to do with the fish that have died during red tide conditions. Contact with fish killed during a red tide does not produce any red tide associated symptoms. However, these fish can present a nuisance, in that they have an unpleasant odor, and attract flies and vermin. These fish may be disposed of according to local solid waste practices. It is recommended that gloves or tools be used to collect any fish and to use double-lined plastic bags for disposal.

 Attached is a summary of common questions and answers about red tide. The public may obtain more information on ongoing red tide events from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute. The Institutes' website is http://research.myfwc.com and the Florida Department of Health website is http:/www.myfloridaEH.com under Aquatic Toxins.

 The Florida Poison Control Information Center in Miami has a toll-free 24/7 Aquatic Toxins Hotline for reporting of illnesses from exposure to red tide, or for more information on red tide and associated health effects, at 1-888-232-8635.

                                                                  ____________**_____________

 

  • 13 Jun 07

WEST PALM BEACH:
Plan in Works for Tallest Building in U.S.

A proposal for one of the most prominent pieces of undeveloped land downtown is a 1,500-foot tower with an observation deck - unmistakably resembling Seattle's Space Needle - that would be the second-highest building in the world and the tallest in the United States. But it's too early to tell what will be actually built on the land.

 

  • May 16, 2007 Rebuilding of red snapper populations in the Gulf

Every Fish Counts Snapper

Dear Richard,
 

The GRN has been working for the rebuilding of red snapper populations in the Gulf for many years, and a light has finally appeared at the end of the tunnel! In March of this year, a federal court ruled in our favor that fisheries managers must take steps to end the overexploitation of red snapper by commercial and recreational fishermen and to rebuild the population.

With the red snapper stock known to be depleted and overexploited since 1988, this victory is a long-time coming. Fun to fish for and a favorite at restaurants across the country, young red snapper are also caught as bycatch in shrimp nets, subjecting the fishery to three significant pressures: recreational fishing, directed commercial fishing, and commercial shrimp fishing.

The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Gulf Council) is now putting together a plan to follow the court decision and rebuild red snapper populations. Please take a moment to support the track the Gulf Council is on, and remind them that a rebuilt red snapper population is worth three times as much to the economy of our region! Visit this website to learn more and send your message:

http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizationsORG/GRN/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=11397

The public comment period closes as the end of the month, so please click to comment now.

For our fish and our future,

 

Aaron Viles
Campaign Director

 

The Gulf Restoration Network (GRN) is a diverse network of local, regional and national groups dedicated to protecting and restoring the valuable resources of the Gulf of Mexico. The GRN has members in the five Gulf states of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida.

If you do not want to receive further emails from the GRN, please click here to change your mailing preferences on the web.

 

**Visit our website at www.healthygulf.org.**

 

 

  • 10 May 07

Seeping seawater threatens Florida's drinking supply

With salt intrusion threatening well fields, water managers called for shutting down four cities' pumps and cutting Broward and Palm Beach to one day of irrigation a week.

With the drought elevating a perpetual problem into a critical concern, state water managers are poised today to impose severe new restrictions to combat a seeping front of sea water that threatens the water supply for hundreds of thousands of coastal residents.

All residents in Broward and Palm Beach counties would be ordered to slash lawn watering to once a week. Utilities in Hallandale Beach, Dania Beach, Lantana and Lake Worth could face shutting down wells where chloride readings, a red flag for salt water intrusion, have been rising for weeks.

Water managers defend such unprecedented steps as necessary to avert more disruptive and expensive damage -- salt contamination of coastal well fields that could force some cities to abandon primary drinking wells or install new treatment systems. At least eight more well fields, from South Miami-Dade to Palm Beach, also are considered ''at risk'' if groundwater levels fall low enough to allow an underground wedge of sea water to push deeper inland.

`A HUGE CONCERN'

''The threat of salt water intrusion is a huge concern,'' said Jesus Rodriguez, spokesman for the South Florida Water Management District, which oversees the water supply for 16 counties.

The district's governing board will meet today in West Palm Beach to consider staff recommendations that would tighten what already rank as the toughest water-use restrictions in South Florida history.

While wildfires and wilted lawns, marshes and crops are the most visible effects of the 17-month long drought, salt intrusion looms as a major threat to the regional water supply -- already so low that drought effects could linger for years, even with a good rainy season.

If wells get too salty to supply water that meets state health standards, it could force cities to look for others sources and further strain a scare resource.

''Once that [salt] creeps in there, it could be years for the wells to be brought back on line,'' Rodriguez said. ``The scenario is a grim one. We could be talking about bottled water for the municipalities for a long time.''

The latest proposed cutbacks could prove costly for Broward and Palm Beach residents, particularly in four cities ordered to shut down major water supply wells.

In Dania Beach, public services director Dominic Orlando said the city still will be able to supply some 12,000 residents with water despite shutting down its two main wells just west of Ravenswood Road. But buying, blending and chemically treating water from Broward County and Hollywood will cost the city $100,000 more a month, an expense residents will see reflected in water bills.

''If we turn off our wells, just to break even we have to implement a surcharge of 60-plus percent,'' said Orlando. He argued that daily monitoring and a gradual decrease in pumping could protect the city's wells without punishing residents' pocketbooks.

''Just to tell us to shut down your system, geez, that's absurd,'' he said.

MORE RESTRICTIONS

Under the proposal, Miami-Dade would remain on twice-weekly watering restrictions -- for now. Above average rainfall in the county has buoyed levels in the southern portions of the Biscayne Aquifer, South Florida's primary source of drinking water.

Still, the district considers a string of wells in South Miami-Dade, including ones that serve Florida City, the Florida Keys, Homestead and parts of the county, at potential risk because they're close to the salt water intrusion line. ''Right now, we're sort of on alert and certainly needing to conserve as a hedge against what may or may not happen over the next couple of months,'' said Doug Yoder, assistant director of Miami-Dade's Water and Sewer Department.

WAITING FOR RAIN

Though Broward and eastern Palm Beach also tap the Biscayne Aquifer, conditions are much drier there, Rodriguez said. Rainfall, despite a promising start in May, has remained well below average for a year and a half and groundwater levels continue to drop -- with no help of replenishment until the rainy season kicks in.

Lake Okeechobee serves as the region's storage reservoir, but at 9.42 feet above sea level Wednesday, it is too low to help. Last month, the district also capped withdrawals from the Everglades water conservation areas west of the suburbs, though water managers have asked federal permission to override environmental regulations to do emergency recharges of well fields.

The problem is that plunging groundwater levels along the coast could weaken what hydrologists call the ''head'' that holds back, or more accurately, slows ocean waters that have been creeping underground for decades.

The heavier salt water tends to wedge under the fresh water, forcing it inland and shrinking the aquifer's coastal boundary.

So far, salt concentrations, measured in chloride readings, remain below state health standards at the at-risk wells. But water managers say cutting local demand is a key to keeping things that way. That's why they're ordering the four most vulnerable cities to shut down pumping, Rodriquez said. A well pulling millions of gallons of water out of the ground can create a so-called cone of influence that helps pull salt water inland.

''We don't want to find ourselves in a scenario in a few weeks down the road where we're having to face a much more critical situation,'' Rodriguez said.

Intrusion is not a new concern. Utilities have been battling it since the 1930s, when new drainage canals and well fields pulled salt water deep into the Miami River.

In 1946, salinity-control gates were installed and the salt water pushed back. But a ''blob'' still remains trapped underground near Miami Springs, said Scott Prinos, a supervisory hydrologist for the U.S. Geological Survey.

Over the years, engineers have learned to control the intrusion, but not stop it completely. The line has shifted in and out after droughts or heavy rains, but enough salt water has crept inland deep enough to turn a number of private and public wells brackish or too salty to use for drinking water.

MAN-MADE CANALS

The current intrusion line snakes six miles into deep Southeastern Miami-Dade, the result largely of drainage canals altering the flow of freshwater marshes. Though the line is thinner in Broward, a few miles at its widest, the risk is greater because more coastal wells were sunk near beachside cities.

Dania Beach, said Orlando, was already scouting locations for new wells farther inland. Drought concerns have expedited the search and upped investments in the water system. A contractor started drilling test wells Monday. The city also is constructing a huge new storage tank and a treatment plant that can handle more water from Broward.

He doesn't think there is any threat taps will run dry.

''The issue, I think, is that provided water is going to be a lot more expensive,'' said Orlando.

cmorgan@MiamiHerald.com

 

Miami Herald staff writer Jennifer Mooney Piedra contributed to this story.

                                                                                 _________**__________

 

  • 24 Feb 06   U.S. scores a D+ on ocean policy.
Hi Richard,

 
U.S. scores a D+ on ocean policy.


Unsustainable fishing practices are wreaking havoc on the red snapper and Gulf fisheries.

Take Action!
The United States has just been graded on the quality and effectiveness of its ocean policy, and guess what? - we got a D+. And nowhere is the failure to protect our marine ecosystems more apparent than off of Florida's coast in the Gulf of Mexico. Take Action!

Economically, red snapper has been a staple of the fishing economy in Florida and the entire Gulf region for over 125 years, supporting important commercial and recreational fisheries. But thanks to poor, irresponsible management, over-fishing has drastically reduced the number of red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico to 3% of their natural levels! Take Action!

Throughout most of the 1960s, Gulf fishermen brought in record catches of red snapper. But in 1967, catches started declining and fish sizes got smaller. Even as fishermen worked harder, their incomes fell. Competition grew for shrinking numbers of fish, so fishermen invested in bigger boats and high-tech fishing gear. This depleted fish stocks further and damaged habitat. Today, the red snapper fisheries are in crisis..

It’s not too late. As fisheries regulators currently debate, we have the opportunity to rebuild the red snapper population, which will benefit the marine ecosystem and future generations of fishing communities that depend on it.

In the past, the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council and the National Marine Fisheries Service have been unable to make the tough decisions necessary to end over fishing of red snapper. That is why we need you to speak up! Tell decision-makers you care about the future of Gulf fishing and don’t want to see it harmed by irresponsible management.

Thank you for making a difference today,

Agata Gussmann
Care2 and ThePetitionSite Team

P.S. How did the U.S. score a D+ for our ocean policy reform? The bipartisan Joint Ocean Commission Initiative just released its report card showing little progress has been made over the past year, and "our nation’s oceans, coasts, and Great Lakes are in serious trouble." (Admiral James D. Watkins, co-chair of the Joint Ocean Commission Initiative) We can start reversing this crisis by protecting the ocean closest to our homes.

                                                                             _________**____________

  • 25 Jan 05  Whale Watchers........
Hi Interested whale observers!
 
I want to let you know that I will be giving a free talk about dolphins and whales at noon on Friday, February 24 at Sandy Bottoms, by Main Beach. My stories, illustrated with my own slides on the big screen t.v. will include some surprising true anecdotes from my many years as education director of Marine World in California.  If you attend, expect to hear some interesting true animal stories, and learn more about their intelligence and individual personalities when they relate to humans.  I will also give more information about the whales and dolphins along our coast, and their behavior and interactions with humans and each other. 
 
It should be a lot of fun--I hope you and your friends can come.  If you do plan on coming, I'd love to know in advance so I can alert Sandy Bottoms about how many to expect. We're in uncharted territory here and don't know what to expect. The Sandy Bottoms announcement is attached below.  The talk will be at lunchtime and if you plan on eating then, that would be good to know in advance too so they can plan for a group.  If you just want to come for the talk, that's ok, too.  One way or the other, come on over and feel free to forward this to others that you know might be interested too.
 
Regards,
 
Pat Foster-Turley, Ph.D.
 
 
DOLPHINS, WHALES and PEOPLE, OH MY!

News-Leader columnist Pat Foster-Turley will share stories of her encounters with some of the world's biggest and smartest mammals. How smart are dolphins, anyway? What lurks behind that beguiling smile? Was there really a Flipper? And, how about those large right whales that migrate off our coast?

Join us at noon on Friday, Feb. 24 in our main dining room. Foster-Turley will show slides, share stories and answer your questions about the creatures that live off our coast. Admission is free and the talk will last about an hour

 

  • 20 Nov 05  Whales vs US Navy Sonar 

By Christopher Munsey  -  Gannett News Service

{Take a look at this site also:  Report: Ocean noise threatens dolphins, whales - Science - MSNBC.com  }


A site off the coast of Wallops Island is one of three possible locations proposed by the Navy to install an undersea warfare training range for the practice of active sonar skills.
A senior Navy official familiar with anti-submarine warfare at the Pentagon said at a recent news briefing that Atlantic Fleet Navy units need a place to practice ASW (anti-submarine warfare) before deploying. That's because of the threat posed by increasingly quiet diesel-electric submarines, often operating in shallow and noisy coastal waters, the official said.
Better technology means that the submarines are now so quiet that passive sonar -- listening for the noise created by the boats -- won't detect their presence until such a submarine is close enough to fire a torpedo, he said.
"You want to take them out before they get that close," he said.
The only sure way to find a quiet submarine lurking beneath the surface is active sonar, which sends a burst of sound, producing an echo when it bounces off an underwater target. The echo is then used to locate the quarry.
No matter how quiet, a submarine can't escape detection from a pulse of sound bouncing off its hull, the official said.
"As submarines get quieter, passive means are less effective. But submarine quieting has no effect on active means," he said.
Called the Undersea Warfare Training Range, the floor of a 500-square-mile section of ocean will be wired with a network of hydrophones.
Using practice torpedoes, helicopters, ships and submarines will use active sonar, sonobuoys and other methods to practice ASW against submarines posing as targets.
Navy officials developed three proposals for the range, all located in larger offshore coastal areas already used for Navy training. The preferred site is about 50 miles offshore, southeast of Cherry Point, N.C.
The area slopes down from more than 100 to about 900 feet deep, giving operators a wide range of depths to conduct ASW training, and different water temperatures, depending on whether training takes place in winter or summer.
The second site proposed is about 45 miles off the coast of Wallops Island, while the third is just off the coast of Jacksonville, Fla. "They are all equally compatible," said Jim Brantley, spokesman for fleet forces command in Norfolk, Va.
Brantley said the decision will not be made until October 2006.
"It's going to be a long process," he said.
The Navy will hold open house information sessions and public hearings in each of the three proposed sites this November.

Officials and experts will hold a public hearing at Chincoteague Community Center on Community Drive on Nov. 15 at 7 p.m. An open house information session will be held from 3:30 to 5:30 p.m.
The meeting will allow the public to gather information on the Navy's possible plans for Wallops Island, including the onshore building that will receive signals transmitted from the sensors buried in the sand off the coast. The building, he said, will be constructed on federal property.
To operate the range, the Navy is seeking a letter of authorization from the National Marine Fisheries Service.
A second Navy official at the briefing said that based on an environmental review of marine mammal species in the area, use of the range will have a negligible effect on sea life.
The officials spoke on background, on the condition that their names not be used.
Environmental concerns raised
The news briefing came a day after a lawsuit filed by the Natural Resources Defense Council on behalf of a coalition of environmental groups in federal court in California.
The group's lawsuit charges that the Navy's use of active sonar violates federal environmental laws, seeks restrictions on where and when Navy units can use active sonar and asks for more environmental studies from the Navy about how active sonar impacts marine mammals.
According to the lawsuit, active sonar harms marine mammals, which use their keen hearing to locate prey, by interfering with their movements and feeding. The loud bursts of sound also cause physical injury, and have been a cause of marine mammals stranding themselves on beaches and dying, the suit alleges.
In its response to the lawsuit, the Navy emphasized that training and testing with active sonar is critical to national defense.
To reduce the impact on marine mammals, Navy watchstanders are trained to spot and identify marine mammals present in an area before a sonar exercise takes place, said Lt. William Marks, a Navy spokesman at the Pentagon.
"Before we use sonar, we'll look for any marine mammals in the area," Marks said.
If mammals are present, sonar exercises will be curtailed or halted, he said.
Staff Writer Kim Mitchell contributed to this report.
Originally published November 8, 2005

Public hearings

The Navy will host three meetings during the comment period so that interested members of the public can learn about the project and the environmental impact statement and offer their comments. The format for these meetings will be open house information sessions in the afternoon and early evening, followed by a public hearing.

Meetings are scheduled as follows:

November 21, 2005
Wilson Center for the Arts
Florida Community College,
Jacksonville South Campus
11901 Beach Boulevard
Jacksonville, FL 32246
904-646-2222

The afternoon open house public information session will be from 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. and the evening open house will start at 6:30 p.m. The public hearing will be held from 7:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.

Comments should be submitted in writing to:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic
Attn: Keith Jenkins
Code EV21 KJ
6506 Hampton Boulevard
Norfolk, VA 23508-1278

Fax: 757-322-4894

All comments must be postmarked December 28, 2005, to ensure that they become part of the official record. All comments on the draft OEIS/EIS will be addressed in the final environmental impact statement.

                                                   ----------------**-----------------

  • 24 Aug 05
Administration Announces Weak New Mileage Standards

Amidst rising oil and gas prices, the Bush Administration yesterday announced its new Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for light trucks. Environmentalists say the proposed rule changes will do nothing to help American motorists at the pump, nor will they reduce America's dependence on imported oil.

The new standards appear to raise the current light truck standard of 22.2 miles per gallon (mpg) in model year 2007 to a fleet-wide standard of 24 mpg by model year 2011.

However, the new standards actually exempt vehicles weighing from 8,500 to 10,000 pounds-- such as the Hummer H2, Ford Excursion, and some models of the Chevy Suburban-- all vehicles that achieve very poor mileage due to their size. [1]

Environmentalists argue that the Bush Administration should make use of the latest in automotive technology and establish a more stringent fleet-wide average standard. Ironically, General Motors is already producing a vehicle in China that achieves 43 miles per gallon.

Instead of harnessing America's technological know-how to require light trucks and autos to meet a 40-mile per gallon (mpg) average standard," said Anna Aurilio, U.S. PIRG legislative director, "the Administration has proposed a pathetically weak increase in light truck miles per gallon standards and has given automakers an opportunity to game the system by increasing the size of their SUVs and other light trucks."

According to the Sierra Club, a 40-mpg standard would save the average driver $2,200 in fuel savings over the lifetime of a vehicle. [2] The distribution of light trucks into six size-based categories was supported by the big three U.S. automakers, General Motors, Ford Motor Co., and DaimlerChrysler AG. [3]

Department of Transportation Secretary Norman T. Mineta boasts that, "This is a plan that will save gas and result in less pain at the pump for motorists without sacrificing safety." [4]

But Dan Becker, director of the Sierra Club's Global Warming Program, says the new standards will do nothing to help consumers save money at the gas pump, reduce oil dependence or curb global warming. "At a time when Americans are paying record prices for gas, the Bush administration has sided with its cronies in the auto industry and rejected real solutions," said Becker.

"Unfortunately, the proposed gains in fuel economy are likely to be eliminated as a result of the radical overhaul of the current structure," the Sierra Club said in a statement released yesterday. [5]

###

SOURCES:
[1] "Bush Administration Fuel Economy Fails to Address Rising Gas Prices," Sierra Club, Aug. 23, 2005.
[2] Ibid.
[3] "Bush Admin Unveils New CAFE Standards for Light Trucks," Greenwire, Aug. 23, 2005.
[4] "Government Proposes New Fuel Standards," Business Week, Aug. 23, 2005.
[5] Sierra Club op. cit.                            

                                                                  _________**________

             Back  to Top

For problems or questions regarding this web contact  webmaster@fofgroup.org

 

 

 

"cfof" are residents of Fernandina Beach, Florida.
 
Last updated: October 20, 2011.